commit 59f5ede3bc upstream.
The FPU usage related to task FPU management is either protected by
disabling interrupts (switch_to, return to user) or via fpregs_lock() which
is a wrapper around local_bh_disable(). When kernel code wants to use the
FPU then it has to check whether it is possible by calling irq_fpu_usable().
But the condition in irq_fpu_usable() is wrong. It allows FPU to be used
when:
!in_interrupt() || interrupted_user_mode() || interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle()
The latter is checking whether some other context already uses FPU in the
kernel, but if that's not the case then it allows FPU to be used
unconditionally even if the calling context interrupted a fpregs_lock()
critical region. If that happens then the FPU state of the interrupted
context becomes corrupted.
Allow in kernel FPU usage only when no other context has in kernel FPU
usage and either the calling context is not hard interrupt context or the
hard interrupt did not interrupt a local bottomhalf disabled region.
It's hard to find a proper Fixes tag as the condition was broken in one way
or the other for a very long time and the eager/lazy FPU changes caused a
lot of churn. Picked something remotely connected from the history.
This survived undetected for quite some time as FPU usage in interrupt
context is rare, but the recent changes to the random code unearthed it at
least on a kernel which had FPU debugging enabled. There is probably a
higher rate of silent corruption as not all issues can be detected by the
FPU debugging code. This will be addressed in a subsequent change.
Fixes: 5d2bd7009f ("x86, fpu: decouple non-lazy/eager fpu restore from xsave")
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220501193102.588689270@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
PKRU for a task is stored in task->thread.pkru when the task is scheduled
out. For 'current' the authoritative source of PKRU is the hardware.
fpu_reset_fpstate() has two callers:
1) fpu__clear_user_states() for !FPU systems. For those PKRU is irrelevant
2) fpu_flush_thread() which is invoked from flush_thread(). flush_thread()
resets the hardware to the kernel restrictive default value.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.802850233@linutronix.de
switch_to() and flush_thread() write the task's PKRU value eagerly so
the PKRU value of current is always valid in the hardware.
That means there is no point in restoring PKRU on exit to user or when
reactivating the task's FPU registers in the signal frame setup path.
This allows to remove all the xstate buffer updates with PKRU values once
the PKRU state is stored in thread struct while a task is scheduled out.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.303919033@linutronix.de
Rename it so it's clear that this is about user ABI features which can
differ from the feature set which the kernel saves and restores because the
kernel handles e.g. PKRU differently. But the user ABI (ptrace, signal
frame) expects it to be there.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.211585137@linutronix.de
copy_kernel_to_fpregs() restores all xfeatures but it is also the place
where the AMD FXSAVE_LEAK bug is handled.
That prevents fpregs_restore_userregs() to limit the restored features,
which is required to untangle PKRU and XSTATE handling and also for the
upcoming supervisor state management.
Move the FXSAVE_LEAK quirk into __copy_kernel_to_fpregs() and deinline that
function which has become rather fat.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.114271278@linutronix.de
Rename it so that it becomes entirely clear what this function is
about. It's purpose is to restore the FPU registers to the state which was
saved in the task's FPU memory state either at context switch or by an in
kernel FPU user.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121456.018867925@linutronix.de
fpu__clear() currently resets both register state and kernel XSAVE buffer
state. It has two modes: one for all state (supervisor and user) and
another for user state only. fpu__clear_all() uses the "all state"
(user_only=0) mode, while a number of signal paths use the user_only=1
mode.
Make fpu__clear() work only for user state (user_only=1) and remove the
"all state" (user_only=0) code. Rename it to match so it can be used by
the signal paths.
Replace the "all state" (user_only=0) fpu__clear() functionality. Use the
TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD functionality instead of making any actual hardware
registers changes in this path.
Instead of invoking fpu__initialize() just memcpy() init_fpstate into the
task's FPU state because that has already the correct format and in case of
PKRU also contains the default PKRU value. Move the actual PKRU write out
into flush_thread() where it belongs and where it will end up anyway when
PKRU and XSTATE have been untangled.
For bisectability a workaround is required which stores the PKRU value in
the xstate memory until PKRU is untangled from XSTATE for context
switching and return to user.
[ Dave Hansen: Polished changelog ]
[ tglx: Fixed the PKRU fallout ]
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.922729522@linutronix.de
There is no point in using copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs() which in turn calls
write_pkru(). write_pkru() tries to fiddle with the task's xstate buffer
for nothing because the XRSTOR[S](init_fpstate) just cleared the xfeature
flag in the xstate header which makes get_xsave_addr() fail.
It's a useless exercise anyway because the reinitialization activates the
FPU so before the task's xstate buffer can be used again a XRSTOR[S] must
happen which in turn dumps the PKRU value.
Get rid of the now unused copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.732508792@linutronix.de
X86_FEATURE_OSPKE is enabled first on the boot CPU and the feature flag is
set. Secondary CPUs have to enable CR4.PKE as well and set their per CPU
feature flag. That's ineffective because all call sites have checks for
boot_cpu_data.
Make it smarter and force the feature flag when PKU is enabled on the boot
cpu which allows then to use cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE) all
over the place. That either compiles the code out when PKEY support is
disabled in Kconfig or uses a static_cpu_has() for the feature check which
makes a significant difference in hotpaths, e.g. context switch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.305113644@linutronix.de
Both function names are a misnomer.
fpu__save() is actually about synchronizing the hardware register state
into the task's memory state so that either coredump or a math exception
handler can inspect the state at the time where the problem happens.
The function guarantees to preserve the register state, while "save" is a
common terminology for saving the current state so it can be modified and
restored later. This is clearly not the case here.
Rename it to fpu_sync_fpstate().
fpu__copy() is used to clone the current task's FPU state when duplicating
task_struct. While the register state is a copy the rest of the FPU state
is not.
Name it accordingly and remove the really pointless @src argument along
with the warning which comes along with it.
Nothing can ever copy the FPU state of a non-current task. It's clearly
just a consequence of arch_dup_task_struct(), but it makes no sense to
proliferate that further.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121455.196727450@linutronix.de
The FNSAVE support requires conditionals in quite some call paths because
FNSAVE reinitializes the FPU hardware. If the save has to preserve the FPU
register state then the caller has to conditionally restore it from memory
when FNSAVE is in use.
This also requires a conditional in context switch because the restore
avoidance optimization cannot work with FNSAVE. As this only affects 20+
years old CPUs there is really no reason to keep this optimization
effective for FNSAVE. It's about time to not optimize for antiques anymore.
Just unconditionally FRSTOR the save content to the registers and clean up
the conditionals all over the place.
Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.617369268@linutronix.de
A copy is guaranteed to leave the source intact, which is not the case when
FNSAVE is used as that reinitilizes the registers.
Save does not make such guarantees and it matches what this is about,
i.e. to save the state for a later restore.
Rename it to save_fpregs_to_fpstate().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.508853062@linutronix.de
The function names for fnsave/fnrstor operations are horribly named and
a permanent source of confusion.
Rename:
copy_kernel_to_fregs() to frstor()
copy_fregs_to_user() to fnsave_to_user_sigframe()
copy_user_to_fregs() to frstor_from_user_sigframe()
so it's clear what these are doing. All these functions are really low
level wrappers around the equally named instructions, so mapping to the
documentation is just natural.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.223594101@linutronix.de
The function names for fxsave/fxrstor operations are horribly named and
a permanent source of confusion.
Rename:
copy_fxregs_to_kernel() to fxsave()
copy_kernel_to_fxregs() to fxrstor()
copy_fxregs_to_user() to fxsave_to_user_sigframe()
copy_user_to_fxregs() to fxrstor_from_user_sigframe()
so it's clear what these are doing. All these functions are really low
level wrappers around the equally named instructions, so mapping to the
documentation is just natural.
While at it, replace the static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FXSR) with
use_fxsr() to be consistent with the rest of the code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121454.017863494@linutronix.de
The function names for xsave[s]/xrstor[s] operations are horribly named and
a permanent source of confusion.
Rename:
copy_xregs_to_kernel() to os_xsave()
copy_kernel_to_xregs() to os_xrstor()
These are truly low level wrappers around the actual instructions
XSAVE[OPT]/XRSTOR and XSAVES/XRSTORS with the twist that the selection
based on the available CPU features happens with an alternative to avoid
conditionals all over the place and to provide the best performance for hot
paths.
The os_ prefix tells that this is the OS selected mechanism.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.830239347@linutronix.de
The only usecase for fpu__write_begin is the set() callback of regset, so
the function is pointlessly global.
Move it to the regset code and rename it to fpu_force_restore() which is
exactly decribing what the function does.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210623121453.328652975@linutronix.de
Currently, requesting kernel FPU access doesn't distinguish which parts of
the extended ("FPU") state are needed. This is nice for simplicity, but
there are a few cases in which it's suboptimal:
- The vast majority of in-kernel FPU users want XMM/YMM/ZMM state but do
not use legacy 387 state. These users want MXCSR initialized but don't
care about the FPU control word. Skipping FNINIT would save time.
(Empirically, FNINIT is several times slower than LDMXCSR.)
- Code that wants MMX doesn't want or need MXCSR initialized.
_mmx_memcpy(), for example, can run before CR4.OSFXSR gets set, and
initializing MXCSR will fail because LDMXCSR generates an #UD when the
aforementioned CR4 bit is not set.
- Any future in-kernel users of XFD (eXtended Feature Disable)-capable
dynamic states will need special handling.
Add a more specific API that allows callers to specify exactly what they
want.
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Olędzki <ole@ans.pl>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aff1cac8b8fc7ee900cf73e8f2369966621b053f.1611205691.git.luto@kernel.org
When saving xstate to a kernel/user XSAVE area with the XSAVE family of
instructions, the current code applies the 'full' instruction mask (-1),
which tries to XSAVE all possible features. This method relies on
hardware to trim 'all possible' down to what is enabled in the
hardware. The code works well for now. However, there will be a
problem, if some features are enabled in hardware, but are not suitable
to be saved into all kernel XSAVE buffers, like task->fpu, due to
performance consideration.
One such example is the Last Branch Records (LBR) state. The LBR state
only contains valuable information when LBR is explicitly enabled by
the perf subsystem, and the size of an LBR state is large (808 bytes
for now). To avoid both CPU overhead and space overhead at each context
switch, the LBR state should not be saved into task->fpu like other
state components. It should be saved/restored on demand when LBR is
enabled in the perf subsystem. Current copy_xregs_to_* will trigger a
buffer overflow for such cases.
Three sites use the '-1' instruction mask which must be updated.
Two are saving/restoring the xstate to/from a kernel-allocated XSAVE
buffer and can use 'xfeatures_mask_all', which will save/restore all of
the features present in a normal task FPU buffer.
The last one saves the register state directly to a user buffer. It
could
also use 'xfeatures_mask_all'. Just as it was with the '-1' argument,
any supervisor states in the mask will be filtered out by the hardware
and not saved to the buffer. But, to be more explicit about what is
expected to be saved, use xfeatures_mask_user() for the instruction
mask.
KVM includes the header file fpu/internal.h. To avoid 'undefined
xfeatures_mask_all' compiling issue, move copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() to
fpu/core.c and export it, because:
- The xfeatures_mask_all is indirectly used via copy_fpregs_to_fpstate()
by KVM. The function which is directly used by other modules should be
exported.
- The copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() is a function, while xfeatures_mask_all
is a variable for the "internal" FPU state. It's safer to export a
function than a variable, which may be implicitly changed by others.
- The copy_fpregs_to_fpstate() is a big function with many checks. The
removal of the inline keyword should not impact the performance.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1593780569-62993-20-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Previously, kernel floating point code would run with the MXCSR control
register value last set by userland code by the thread that was active
on the CPU core just before kernel call. This could affect calculation
results if rounding mode was changed, or a crash if a FPU/SIMD exception
was unmasked.
Restore MXCSR to the kernel's default value.
[ bp: Carve out from a bigger patch by Petteri, add feature check, add
FNINIT call too (amluto). ]
Signed-off-by: Petteri Aimonen <jpa@git.mail.kapsi.fi>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207979
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200624114646.28953-2-bp@alien8.de
Currently, fpu__clear() clears all fpregs and xstates. Once XSAVES
supervisor states are introduced, supervisor settings (e.g. CET xstates)
must remain active for signals; It is necessary to have separate functions:
- Create fpu__clear_user_states(): clear only user settings for signals;
- Create fpu__clear_all(): clear both user and supervisor settings in
flush_thread().
Also modify copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs() to take a mask from above two
functions.
Remove obvious side-comment in fpu__clear(), while at it.
[ bp: Make the second argument of fpu__clear() bool after requesting it
a bunch of times during review.
- Add a comment about copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs() locking needs. ]
Co-developed-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200512145444.15483-6-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com
Add SPDX license identifiers to all files which:
- Have no license information of any form
- Have EXPORT_.*_SYMBOL_GPL inside which was used in the
initial scan/conversion to ignore the file
These files fall under the project license, GPL v2 only. The resulting SPDX
license identifier is:
GPL-2.0-only
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Defer loading of FPU state until return to userspace. This gives
the kernel the potential to skip loading FPU state for tasks that
stay in kernel mode, or for tasks that end up with repeated
invocations of kernel_fpu_begin() & kernel_fpu_end().
The fpregs_lock/unlock() section ensures that the registers remain
unchanged. Otherwise a context switch or a bottom half could save the
registers to its FPU context and the processor's FPU registers would
became random if modified at the same time.
KVM swaps the host/guest registers on entry/exit path. This flow has
been kept as is. First it ensures that the registers are loaded and then
saves the current (host) state before it loads the guest's registers. The
swap is done at the very end with disabled interrupts so it should not
change anymore before theg guest is entered. The read/save version seems
to be cheaper compared to memcpy() in a micro benchmark.
Each thread gets TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD set as part of fork() / fpu__copy().
For kernel threads, this flag gets never cleared which avoids saving /
restoring the FPU state for kernel threads and during in-kernel usage of
the FPU registers.
[
bp: Correct and update commit message and fix checkpatch warnings.
s/register/registers/ where it is used in plural.
minor comment corrections.
remove unused trace_x86_fpu_activate_state() TP.
]
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-24-bigeasy@linutronix.de
user_fpu_begin() sets fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx to task's fpu struct. This is
always the case since there is no lazy FPU anymore.
fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx is used during context switch to decide if it needs
to load the saved registers or if the currently loaded registers are
valid. It could be skipped during a
taskA -> kernel thread -> taskA
switch because the switch to the kernel thread would not alter the CPU's
sFPU tate.
Since this field is always updated during context switch and
never invalidated, setting it manually (in user context) makes no
difference. A kernel thread with kernel_fpu_begin() block could
set fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx to NULL but a kernel thread does not use
user_fpu_begin().
This is a leftover from the lazy-FPU time.
Remove user_fpu_begin(), it does not change fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx's
content.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-9-bigeasy@linutronix.de
The struct fpu.initialized member is always set to one for user tasks
and zero for kernel tasks. This avoids saving/restoring the FPU
registers for kernel threads.
The ->initialized = 0 case for user tasks has been removed in previous
changes, for instance, by doing an explicit unconditional init at fork()
time for FPU-less systems which was otherwise delayed until the emulated
opcode.
The context switch code (switch_fpu_prepare() + switch_fpu_finish())
can't unconditionally save/restore registers for kernel threads. Not
only would it slow down the switch but also load a zeroed xcomp_bv for
XSAVES.
For kernel_fpu_begin() (+end) the situation is similar: EFI with runtime
services uses this before alternatives_patched is true. Which means that
this function is used too early and it wasn't the case before.
For those two cases, use current->mm to distinguish between user and
kernel thread. For kernel_fpu_begin() skip save/restore of the FPU
registers.
During the context switch into a kernel thread don't do anything. There
is no reason to save the FPU state of a kernel thread.
The reordering in __switch_to() is important because the current()
pointer needs to be valid before switch_fpu_finish() is invoked so ->mm
is seen of the new task instead the old one.
N.B.: fpu__save() doesn't need to check ->mm because it is called by
user tasks only.
[ bp: Massage. ]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
Cc: Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>
Cc: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de
The preempt_disable() section was introduced in commit
a10b6a16cd ("x86/fpu: Make the fpu state change in fpu__clear() scheduler-atomic")
and it was said to be temporary.
fpu__initialize() initializes the FPU struct to its initial value and
then sets ->initialized to 1. The last part is the important one.
The content of the state does not matter because it gets set via
copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs().
A preemption here has little meaning because the registers will always be
set to the same content after copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(). A softirq
with a kernel_fpu_begin() could also force to save FPU's registers after
fpu__initialize() without changing the outcome here.
Remove the preempt_disable() section in fpu__clear(), preemption here
does not hurt.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190403164156.19645-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de
The next patch in this series will have to make the definition of
irq_cpustat_t available to entering_irq().
Inclusion of asm/hardirq.h into asm/apic.h would cause circular header
dependencies like
asm/smp.h
asm/apic.h
asm/hardirq.h
linux/irq.h
linux/topology.h
linux/smp.h
asm/smp.h
or
linux/gfp.h
linux/mmzone.h
asm/mmzone.h
asm/mmzone_64.h
asm/smp.h
asm/apic.h
asm/hardirq.h
linux/irq.h
linux/irqdesc.h
linux/kobject.h
linux/sysfs.h
linux/kernfs.h
linux/idr.h
linux/gfp.h
and others.
This causes compilation errors because of the header guards becoming
effective in the second inclusion: symbols/macros that had been defined
before wouldn't be available to intermediate headers in the #include chain
anymore.
A possible workaround would be to move the definition of irq_cpustat_t
into its own header and include that from both, asm/hardirq.h and
asm/apic.h.
However, this wouldn't solve the real problem, namely asm/harirq.h
unnecessarily pulling in all the linux/irq.h cruft: nothing in
asm/hardirq.h itself requires it. Also, note that there are some other
archs, like e.g. arm64, which don't have that #include in their
asm/hardirq.h.
Remove the linux/irq.h #include from x86' asm/hardirq.h.
Fix resulting compilation errors by adding appropriate #includes to *.c
files as needed.
Note that some of these *.c files could be cleaned up a bit wrt. to their
set of #includes, but that should better be done from separate patches, if
at all.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The x86 FPU code used to have a complex state machine where both the FPU
registers and the FPU state context could be 'active' (or inactive)
independently of each other - which enabled features like lazy FPU restore.
Much of this complexity is gone in the current code: now we basically can
have FPU-less tasks (kernel threads) that don't use (and save/restore) FPU
state at all, plus full FPU users that save/restore directly with no laziness
whatsoever.
But the fpu::fpstate_active still carries bits of the old complexity - meanwhile
this flag has become a simple flag that shows whether the FPU context saving
area in the thread struct is initialized and used, or not.
Rename it to fpu::initialized to express this simplicity in the name as well.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170923130016.21448-30-mingo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
