Fix bug of commit 74d46992e0 ("block: replace bi_bdev with a gendisk
pointer and partitions index").
bio_dev(bio) is used to find the dev state in function
__btrfsic_submit_bio. But when dev_state is added to the hashtable, it
is using dev_t of block_device.
bio_dev(bio) returns a dev_t of part0 which is different from dev_t in
block_device(bd_dev). bd_dev in block_device represents the exact
partition.
block_device.bd_dev =
bio->bi_partno (same as block_device.bd_partno) + bio_dev(bio).
When adding a dev_state into hashtable, we use the exact partition dev_t.
So when looking it up, it should also use the exact partition dev_t.
Reproducer of this bug:
Use MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o check_int" and run btrfs/001 in fstests.
Then there will be WARNING like below.
WARNING:
btrfs: attempt to write superblock which references block M @29523968 (sda7 /1111654400/2) which is never written!
Signed-off-by: Gu JinXiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit d28e649a5c)
commit 0d228ece59 upstream.
At the time of forced unmount we place the running replace to
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_SUSPENDED state, so when the system comes
back and expect the target device is missing.
Then let the replace state continue to be in
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_SUSPENDED state instead of
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_STARTED as there isn't any matching scrub
running as part of replace.
Fixes: e93c89c1aa ("Btrfs: add new sources for device replace code")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 5c06147128 upstream.
When we fail to start a transaction in btrfs_dev_replace_start, we leave
dev_replace->replace_start set to STARTED but clear ->srcdev and
->tgtdev. Later, that can result in an Oops in
btrfs_dev_replace_progress when having state set to STARTED or SUSPENDED
implies that ->srcdev is valid.
Also fix error handling when the state is already STARTED or SUSPENDED
while starting. That, too, will clear ->srcdev and ->tgtdev even though
it doesn't own them. This should be an impossible case to hit since we
should be protected by the BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP bit being set. Let's add an
ASSERT there while we're at it.
Fixes: e93c89c1aa (Btrfs: add new sources for device replace code)
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 1690dd41e0 ]
In the error handling block, err holds the return value of either
btrfs_del_root_ref() or btrfs_del_inode_ref() but it hasn't been checked
since it's introduction with commit fe66a05a06 (Btrfs: improve error
handling for btrfs_insert_dir_item callers) in 2012.
If the error handling in the error handling fails, there's not much left
to do and the abort either happened earlier in the callees or is
necessary here.
So if one of btrfs_del_root_ref() or btrfs_del_inode_ref() failed, abort
the transaction, but still return the original code of the failure
stored in 'ret' as this will be reported to the user.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 77b7aad195 upstream.
This reverts commit e73e81b6d0.
This patch causes a few problems:
- adds latency to btrfs_finish_ordered_io
- as btrfs_finish_ordered_io is used for free space cache, generating
more work from btrfs_btree_balance_dirty_nodelay could end up in the
same workque, effectively deadlocking
12260 kworker/u96:16+btrfs-freespace-write D
[<0>] balance_dirty_pages+0x6e6/0x7ad
[<0>] balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited+0x6bb/0xa90
[<0>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x3da/0x770
[<0>] normal_work_helper+0x1c5/0x5a0
[<0>] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x5a0
[<0>] worker_thread+0x46/0x3d0
[<0>] kthread+0xf5/0x130
[<0>] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[<0>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Transaction commit will wait on the freespace cache:
838 btrfs-transacti D
[<0>] btrfs_start_ordered_extent+0x154/0x1e0
[<0>] btrfs_wait_ordered_range+0xbd/0x110
[<0>] __btrfs_wait_cache_io+0x49/0x1a0
[<0>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x10b/0x3b0
[<0>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x215/0x2b0
[<0>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x37e/0x910
[<0>] transaction_kthread+0x14d/0x180
[<0>] kthread+0xf5/0x130
[<0>] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[<0>] 0xffffffffffffffff
And then writepages ends up waiting on transaction commit:
9520 kworker/u96:13+flush-btrfs-1 D
[<0>] wait_current_trans+0xac/0xe0
[<0>] start_transaction+0x21b/0x4b0
[<0>] cow_file_range_inline+0x10b/0x6b0
[<0>] cow_file_range.isra.69+0x329/0x4a0
[<0>] run_delalloc_range+0x105/0x3c0
[<0>] writepage_delalloc+0x119/0x180
[<0>] __extent_writepage+0x10c/0x390
[<0>] extent_write_cache_pages+0x26f/0x3d0
[<0>] extent_writepages+0x4f/0x80
[<0>] do_writepages+0x17/0x60
[<0>] __writeback_single_inode+0x59/0x690
[<0>] writeback_sb_inodes+0x291/0x4e0
[<0>] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x87/0xb0
[<0>] wb_writeback+0x3bb/0x500
[<0>] wb_workfn+0x40d/0x610
[<0>] process_one_work+0x1ee/0x5a0
[<0>] worker_thread+0x1e0/0x3d0
[<0>] kthread+0xf5/0x130
[<0>] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[<0>] 0xffffffffffffffff
Eventually, we have every process in the system waiting on
balance_dirty_pages(), and nobody is able to make progress on page
writeback.
The original patch tried to fix an OOM condition, that happened on 4.4 but no
success reproducing that on later kernels (4.19 and 4.20). This is more likely
a problem in OOM itself.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20180528054821.9092-1-ethanlien@synology.com/
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+
CC: ethanlien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 41bd606769 upstream.
The log tree has a long standing problem that when a file is fsync'ed we
only check for new ancestors, created in the current transaction, by
following only the hard link for which the fsync was issued. We follow the
ancestors using the VFS' dget_parent() API. This means that if we create a
new link for a file in a directory that is new (or in an any other new
ancestor directory) and then fsync the file using an old hard link, we end
up not logging the new ancestor, and on log replay that new hard link and
ancestor do not exist. In some cases, involving renames, the file will not
exist at all.
Example:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
mount /dev/sdb /mnt
mkdir /mnt/A
touch /mnt/foo
ln /mnt/foo /mnt/A/bar
xfs_io -c fsync /mnt/foo
<power failure>
In this example after log replay only the hard link named 'foo' exists
and directory A does not exist, which is unexpected. In other major linux
filesystems, such as ext4, xfs and f2fs for example, both hard links exist
and so does directory A after mounting again the filesystem.
Checking if any new ancestors are new and need to be logged was added in
2009 by commit 12fcfd22fe ("Btrfs: tree logging unlink/rename fixes"),
however only for the ancestors of the hard link (dentry) for which the
fsync was issued, instead of checking for all ancestors for all of the
inode's hard links.
So fix this by tracking the id of the last transaction where a hard link
was created for an inode and then on fsync fallback to a full transaction
commit when an inode has more than one hard link and at least one new hard
link was created in the current transaction. This is the simplest solution
since this is not a common use case (adding frequently hard links for
which there's an ancestor created in the current transaction and then
fsync the file). In case it ever becomes a common use case, a solution
that consists of iterating the fs/subvol btree for each hard link and
check if any ancestor is new, could be implemented.
This solves many unexpected scenarios reported by Jayashree Mohan and
Vijay Chidambaram, and for which there is a new test case for fstests
under review.
Fixes: 12fcfd22fe ("Btrfs: tree logging unlink/rename fixes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reported-by: Vijay Chidambaram <vvijay03@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Jayashree Mohan <jayashree2912@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit a4390aee72 ]
When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move
(rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at
apply_children_dir_moves().
An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where
directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes.
Parent snapshot:
.
|--- 261/
|--- 271/
|--- 266/
|--- 259/
|--- 260/
| |--- 267
|
|--- 264/
| |--- 258/
| |--- 257/
|
|--- 265/
|--- 268/
|--- 269/
| |--- 262/
|
|--- 270/
|--- 272/
| |--- 263/
| |--- 275/
|
|--- 274/
|--- 273/
Send snapshot:
.
|-- 275/
|-- 274/
|-- 273/
|-- 262/
|-- 269/
|-- 258/
|-- 271/
|-- 268/
|-- 267/
|-- 270/
|-- 259/
| |-- 265/
|
|-- 272/
|-- 257/
|-- 260/
|-- 264/
|-- 263/
|-- 261/
|-- 266/
When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its
new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then
when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode
because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay
the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is
its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved.
When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations
that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in
the following iterations:
1) We issue the move operation for inode 274;
2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was
delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the
move operation for inode 262;
3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by
inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot);
4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262);
5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272);
6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272);
7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269);
8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257);
9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258);
10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264);
11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271);
12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was
delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for
inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is
moved;
13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263);
14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was
delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for
inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is
moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12);
15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268);
16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was
delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for
inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is
moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added
again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14;
17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode
266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in
the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay
inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding
the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16.
The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack
(the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then
again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in
an infinite loop.
So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the
stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of
pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will
not return anything for the current parent inode.
A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit f8397d69da upstream.
When a metadata read is served the endio routine btree_readpage_end_io_hook
is called which eventually runs the tree-checker. If tree-checker fails
to validate the read eb then it sets EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This
leads to btree_read_extent_buffer_pages wrongly assuming that all
available copies of this extent buffer are wrong and failing prematurely.
Fix this modify btree_read_extent_buffer_pages to read all copies of
the data.
This failure was exhibitted in xfstests btrfs/124 which would
spuriously fail its balance operations. The reason was that when balance
was run following re-introduction of the missing raid1 disk
__btrfs_map_block would map the read request to stripe 0, which
corresponded to devid 2 (the disk which is being removed in the test):
item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 3553624064) itemoff 15975 itemsize 112
length 1073741824 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|RAID1
io_align 65536 io_width 65536 sector_size 4096
num_stripes 2 sub_stripes 1
stripe 0 devid 2 offset 2156920832
dev_uuid 8466c350-ed0c-4c3b-b17d-6379b445d5c8
stripe 1 devid 1 offset 3553624064
dev_uuid 1265d8db-5596-477e-af03-df08eb38d2ca
This caused read requests for a checksum item that to be routed to the
stale disk which triggered the aforementioned logic involving
EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This then triggered cascading failures of
the balance operation.
Fixes: a826d6dcb3 ("Btrfs: check items for correctness as we search")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 10950929e9 upstream.
[BUG]
A completely valid btrfs will refuse to mount, with error message like:
BTRFS critical (device sdb2): corrupt leaf: root=2 block=239681536 slot=172 \
bg_start=12018974720 bg_len=10888413184, invalid block group size, \
have 10888413184 expect (0, 10737418240]
This has been reported several times as the 4.19 kernel is now being
used. The filesystem refuses to mount, but is otherwise ok and booting
4.18 is a workaround.
Btrfs check returns no error, and all kernels used on this fs is later
than 2011, which should all have the 10G size limit commit.
[CAUSE]
For a 12 devices btrfs, we could allocate a chunk larger than 10G due to
stripe stripe bump up.
__btrfs_alloc_chunk()
|- max_stripe_size = 1G
|- max_chunk_size = 10G
|- data_stripe = 11
|- if (1G * 11 > 10G) {
stripe_size = 976128930;
stripe_size = round_up(976128930, SZ_16M) = 989855744
However the final stripe_size (989855744) * 11 = 10888413184, which is
still larger than 10G.
[FIX]
For the comprehensive check, we need to do the full check at chunk read
time, and rely on bg <-> chunk mapping to do the check.
We could just skip the length check for now.
Fixes: fce466eab7 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 42a657f576 upstream.
The function relocate_block_group calls btrfs_end_transaction to release
trans when update_backref_cache returns 1, and then continues the loop
body. If btrfs_block_rsv_refill fails this time, it will jump out the
loop and the freed trans will be accessed. This may result in a
use-after-free bug. The patch assigns NULL to trans after trans is
released so that it will not be accessed.
Fixes: 0647bf564f ("Btrfs: improve forever loop when doing balance relocation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit f505754fd6 upstream.
We were using the path name received from user space without checking that
it is null terminated. While btrfs-progs is well behaved and does proper
validation and null termination, someone could call the ioctl and pass
a non-null terminated patch, leading to buffer overrun problems in the
kernel. The ioctl is protected by CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
So just set the last byte of the path to a null character, similar to what
we do in other ioctls (add/remove/resize device, snapshot creation, etc).
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit f556faa46e upstream.
Although we have tree level check at tree read runtime, it's completely
based on its parent level.
We still need to do accurate level check to avoid invalid tree blocks
sneak into kernel space.
The check itself is simple, for leaf its level should always be 0.
For nodes its level should be in range [1, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1].
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.14:
- Pass root instead of fs_info to generic_err()
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 514c7dca85 upstream.
A crafted btrfs image with incorrect chunk<->block group mapping will
trigger a lot of unexpected things as the mapping is essential.
Although the problem can be caught by block group item checker
added in "btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item", it's still not
sufficient. A sufficiently valid block group item can pass the check
added by the mentioned patch but could fail to match the existing chunk.
This patch will add extra block group -> chunk mapping check, to ensure
we have a completely matching (start, len, flags) chunk for each block
group at mount time.
Here we reuse the original helper find_first_block_group(), which is
already doing the basic bg -> chunk checks, adding further checks of the
start/len and type flags.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199837
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit ba480dd4db upstream.
A crafted image has empty root tree block, which will later cause NULL
pointer dereference.
The following trees should never be empty:
1) Tree root
Must contain at least root items for extent tree, device tree and fs
tree
2) Chunk tree
Or we can't even bootstrap as it contains the mapping.
3) Fs tree
At least inode item for top level inode (.).
4) Device tree
Dev extents for chunks
5) Extent tree
Must have corresponding extent for each chunk.
If any of them is empty, we are sure the fs is corrupted and no need to
mount it.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Tested-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.14: Pass root instead of fs_info to generic_err()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit fce466eab7 upstream.
A crafted image with invalid block group items could make free space cache
code to cause panic.
We could detect such invalid block group item by checking:
1) Item size
Known fixed value.
2) Block group size (key.offset)
We have an upper limit on block group item (10G)
3) Chunk objectid
Known fixed value.
4) Type
Only 4 valid type values, DATA, METADATA, SYSTEM and DATA|METADATA.
No more than 1 bit set for profile type.
5) Used space
No more than the block group size.
This should allow btrfs to detect and refuse to mount the crafted image.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199849
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.14:
- In check_leaf_item(), pass root->fs_info to check_block_group_item()
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit e2683fc9d2 upstream.
I've noticed that the updated item checker stack consumption increased
dramatically in 542f5385e20cf97447 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add checker
for dir item")
tree-checker.c:check_leaf +552 (176 -> 728)
The array is 255 bytes long, dynamic allocation would slow down the
sanity checks so it's more reasonable to keep it on-stack. Moving the
variable to the scope of use reduces the stack usage again
tree-checker.c:check_leaf -264 (728 -> 464)
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 7cfad65297 upstream.
The return value of sizeof() is of type size_t, so we must print it
using the %z format modifier rather than %l to avoid this warning
on some architectures:
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c: In function 'check_dir_item':
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c:273:50: error: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'u32' {aka 'unsigned int'} [-Werror=format=]
Fixes: 005887f2e3e0 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add checker for dir item")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit ad7b0368f3 upstream.
Add checker for dir item, for key types DIR_ITEM, DIR_INDEX and
XATTR_ITEM.
This checker does comprehensive checks for:
1) dir_item header and its data size
Against item boundary and maximum name/xattr length.
This part is mostly the same as old verify_dir_item().
2) dir_type
Against maximum file types, and against key type.
Since XATTR key should only have FT_XATTR dir item, and normal dir
item type should not have XATTR key.
The check between key->type and dir_type is newly introduced by this
patch.
3) name hash
For XATTR and DIR_ITEM key, key->offset is name hash (crc32c).
Check the hash of the name against the key to ensure it's correct.
The name hash check is only found in btrfs-progs before this patch.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 69fc6cbbac upstream.
[BUG]
If we run btrfs with CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS=y, it will
instantly cause kernel panic like:
------
...
assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/disk-io.c, line: 3853
...
Call Trace:
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty+0x187/0x1f0 [btrfs]
setup_items_for_insert+0x385/0x650 [btrfs]
__btrfs_drop_extents+0x129a/0x1870 [btrfs]
...
-----
[Cause]
Btrfs will call btrfs_check_leaf() in btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() to check
if the leaf is valid with CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS=y.
However quite some btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() callers(*) don't really
initialize its item data but only initialize its item pointers, leaving
item data uninitialized.
This makes tree-checker catch uninitialized data as error, causing
such panic.
*: These callers include but not limited to
setup_items_for_insert()
btrfs_split_item()
btrfs_expand_item()
[Fix]
Add a new parameter @check_item_data to btrfs_check_leaf().
With @check_item_data set to false, item data check will be skipped and
fallback to old btrfs_check_leaf() behavior.
So we can still get early warning if we screw up item pointers, and
avoid false panic.
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Lakshmipathi.G <lakshmipathi.g@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit bba4f29896 upstream.
Use inline function to replace macro since we don't need
stringification.
(Macro still exists until all callers get updated)
And add more info about the error, and replace EIO with EUCLEAN.
For nr_items error, report if it's too large or too small, and output
the valid value range.
For node block pointer, added a new alignment checker.
For key order, also output the next key to make the problem more
obvious.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
[ wording adjustments, unindented long strings ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 557ea5dd00 upstream.
It's no doubt the comprehensive tree block checker will become larger,
so moving them into their own files is quite reasonable.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
[ wording adjustments ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 4b865cab96 upstream.
EXTENT_CSUM checker is a relatively easy one, only needs to check:
1) Objectid
Fixed to BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_OBJECTID
2) Key offset alignment
Must be aligned to sectorsize
3) Item size alignedment
Must be aligned to csum size
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 40c3c40947 upstream.
Add extra checks for item with EXTENT_DATA type. This checks the
following thing:
0) Key offset
All key offsets must be aligned to sectorsize.
Inline extent must have 0 for key offset.
1) Item size
Uncompressed inline file extent size must match item size.
(Compressed inline file extent has no information about its on-disk size.)
Regular/preallocated file extent size must be a fixed value.
2) Every member of regular file extent item
Including alignment for bytenr and offset, possible value for
compression/encryption/type.
3) Type/compression/encode must be one of the valid values.
This should be the most comprehensive and strict check in the context
of btrfs_item for EXTENT_DATA.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ switch to BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_TYPES, similar to what
BTRFS_COMPRESS_TYPES does ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 7f43d4affb upstream.
Function check_leaf() checks if any item pointer points outside of the
leaf, but it doesn't check if the pointer overlaps with the item itself.
Normally only the last item may be the victim, but adding such check is
never a bad idea anyway.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit c3267bbaa9 upstream.
Current check_leaf() function does a good job checking key order and
item offset/size.
However it only checks from slot 0 to the last but one slot, this is
good but makes later expansion hard.
So this refactoring iterates from slot 0 to the last slot.
For key comparison, it uses a key with all 0 as initial key, so all
valid keys should be larger than that.
And for item size/offset checks, it compares current item end with
previous item offset.
For slot 0, use leaf end as a special case.
This makes later item/key offset checks and item size checks easier to
be implemented.
Also, makes check_leaf() to return -EUCLEAN other than -EIO to indicate
error.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 7ef49515fa upstream.
If a crafted image has missing block group items, it could cause
unexpected behavior and breaks the assumption of 1:1 chunk<->block group
mapping.
Although we have the block group -> chunk mapping check, we still need
chunk -> block group mapping check.
This patch will do extra check to ensure each chunk has its
corresponding block group.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit ac765f83f1 upstream.
We currently allow cloning a range from a file which includes the last
block of the file even if the file's size is not aligned to the block
size. This is fine and useful when the destination file has the same size,
but when it does not and the range ends somewhere in the middle of the
destination file, it leads to corruption because the bytes between the EOF
and the end of the block have undefined data (when there is support for
discard/trimming they have a value of 0x00).
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ export foo_size=$((256 * 1024 + 100))
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0x3c 0 $foo_size" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb5 0 1M" /mnt/bar
$ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/foo 0 512K $foo_size" /mnt/bar
$ od -A d -t x1 /mnt/bar
0000000 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5
*
0524288 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c 3c
*
0786528 3c 3c 3c 3c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0786544 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
*
0790528 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5 b5
*
1048576
The bytes in the range from 786532 (512Kb + 256Kb + 100 bytes) to 790527
(512Kb + 256Kb + 4Kb - 1) got corrupted, having now a value of 0x00 instead
of 0xb5.
This is similar to the problem we had for deduplication that got recently
fixed by commit de02b9f6bb ("Btrfs: fix data corruption when
deduplicating between different files").
Fix this by not allowing such operations to be performed and return the
errno -EINVAL to user space. This is what XFS is doing as well at the VFS
level. This change however now makes us return -EINVAL instead of
-EOPNOTSUPP for cases where the source range maps to an inline extent and
the destination range's end is smaller then the destination file's size,
since the detection of inline extents is done during the actual process of
dropping file extent items (at __btrfs_drop_extents()). Returning the
-EINVAL error is done early on and solely based on the input parameters
(offsets and length) and destination file's size. This makes us consistent
with XFS and anyone else supporting cloning since this case is now checked
at a higher level in the VFS and is where the -EINVAL will be returned
from starting with kernel 4.20 (the VFS changed was introduced in 4.20-rc1
by commit 07d19dc9fb ("vfs: avoid problematic remapping requests into
partial EOF block"). So this change is more geared towards stable kernels,
as it's unlikely the new VFS checks get removed intentionally.
A test case for fstests follows soon, as well as an update to filter
existing tests that expect -EOPNOTSUPP to accept -EINVAL as well.
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 4ee3fad34a upstream.
When we have the no-holes mode enabled and fsync a file after punching a
hole in it, we can end up not logging the whole hole range in the log tree.
This happens if the file has extent items that span more than one leaf and
we punch a hole that covers a range that starts in a leaf but does not go
beyond the offset of the first extent in the next leaf.
Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes -n 65536 /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ for ((i = 0; i <= 831; i++)); do
offset=$((i * 2 * 256 * 1024))
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 256K $offset 256K" \
/mnt/foobar >/dev/null
done
$ sync
# We now have 2 leafs in our filesystem fs tree, the first leaf has an
# item corresponding the extent at file offset 216530944 and the second
# leaf has a first item corresponding to the extent at offset 217055232.
# Now we punch a hole that partially covers the range of the extent at
# offset 216530944 but does go beyond the offset 217055232.
$ xfs_io -c "fpunch $((216530944 + 128 * 1024 - 4000)) 256K" /mnt/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar
<power fail>
# mount to replay the log
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
# Before this patch, only the subrange [216658016, 216662016[ (length of
# 4000 bytes) was logged, leaving an incorrect file layout after log
# replay.
Fix this by checking if there is a hole between the last extent item that
we processed and the first extent item in the next leaf, and if there is
one, log an explicit hole extent item.
Fixes: 16e7549f04 ("Btrfs: incompatible format change to remove hole extents")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 421f0922a2 upstream.
At inode.c:evict_inode_truncate_pages(), when we iterate over the
inode's extent states, we access an extent state record's "state" field
after we unlocked the inode's io tree lock. This can lead to a
use-after-free issue because after we unlock the io tree that extent
state record might have been freed due to being merged into another
adjacent extent state record (a previous inflight bio for a read
operation finished in the meanwhile which unlocked a range in the io
tree and cause a merge of extent state records, as explained in the
comment before the while loop added in commit 6ca0709756 ("Btrfs: fix
hang during inode eviction due to concurrent readahead")).
Fix this by keeping a copy of the extent state's flags in a local
variable and using it after unlocking the io tree.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201189
Fixes: b9d0b38928 ("btrfs: Add handler for invalidate page")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 30928e9baa upstream.
This could result in a really bad case where we do something like
evict
evict_refill_and_join
btrfs_commit_transaction
btrfs_run_delayed_iputs
evict
evict_refill_and_join
btrfs_commit_transaction
... forever
We have plenty of other places where we run delayed iputs that are much
safer, let those do the work.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 49940bdd57 upstream.
When we insert the file extent once the ordered extent completes we free
the reserved extent reservation as it'll have been migrated to the
bytes_used counter. However if we error out after this step we'll still
clear the reserved extent reservation, resulting in a negative
accounting of the reserved bytes for the block group and space info.
Fix this by only doing the free if we didn't successfully insert a file
extent for this extent.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit fb5c39d7a8 upstream.
max_extent_size is supposed to be the largest contiguous range for the
space info, and ctl->free_space is the total free space in the block
group. We need to keep track of these separately and _only_ use the
max_free_space if we don't have a max_extent_size, as that means our
original request was too large to search any of the block groups for and
therefore wouldn't have a max_extent_size set.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit ad22cf6ea4 upstream.
We can't use entry->bytes if our entry is a bitmap entry, we need to use
entry->max_extent_size in that case. Fix up all the logic to make this
consistent.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7ed586d0a8 upstream.
When using the NO_HOLES feature and logging a regular file, we were
expecting that if we find an inline extent, that either its size in RAM
(uncompressed and unenconded) matches the size of the file or if it does
not, that it matches the sector size and it represents compressed data.
This assertion does not cover a case where the length of the inline extent
is smaller than the sector size and also smaller the file's size, such
case is possible through fallocate. Example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f -O no-holes /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb60 0 21" /mnt/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "falloc 40 40" /mnt/foobar
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foobar
In the above example we trigger the assertion because the inline extent's
length is 21 bytes while the file size is 80 bytes. The fallocate() call
merely updated the file's size and did not touch the existing inline
extent, as expected.
So fix this by adjusting the assertion so that an inline extent length
smaller than the file size is valid if the file size is smaller than the
filesystem's sector size.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com>
Fixes: a89ca6f24f ("Btrfs: fix fsync after truncate when no_holes feature is enabled")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAE5jQCfRSBC7n4pUTFJcmHh109=gwyT9mFkCOL+NKfzswmR=_Q@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 3527a018c0 upstream.
At inode.c:compress_file_range(), under the "free_pages_out" label, we can
end up dereferencing the "pages" pointer when it has a NULL value. This
case happens when "start" has a value of 0 and we fail to allocate memory
for the "pages" pointer. When that happens we jump to the "cont" label and
then enter the "if (start == 0)" branch where we immediately call the
cow_file_range_inline() function. If that function returns 0 (success
creating an inline extent) or an error (like -ENOMEM for example) we jump
to the "free_pages_out" label and then access "pages[i]" leading to a NULL
pointer dereference, since "nr_pages" has a value greater than zero at
that point.
Fix this by setting "nr_pages" to 0 when we fail to allocate memory for
the "pages" pointer.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201119
Fixes: 771ed689d2 ("Btrfs: Optimize compressed writeback and reads")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9c7b0c2e8d upstream.
[BUG]
In the following case, rescan won't zero out the number of qgroup 1/0:
$ mkfs.btrfs -fq $DEV
$ mount $DEV /mnt
$ btrfs quota enable /mnt
$ btrfs qgroup create 1/0 /mnt
$ btrfs sub create /mnt/sub
$ btrfs qgroup assign 0/257 1/0 /mnt
$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/sub/file bs=1k count=1000
$ btrfs sub snap /mnt/sub /mnt/snap
$ btrfs quota rescan -w /mnt
$ btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child
-------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ -----
0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
0/257 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none 1/0 ---
0/258 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
1/0 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- 0/257
So far so good, but:
$ btrfs qgroup remove 0/257 1/0 /mnt
WARNING: quotas may be inconsistent, rescan needed
$ btrfs quota rescan -w /mnt
$ btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt
qgoupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child
-------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ -----
0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
0/257 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
0/258 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
1/0 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- ---
^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ not cleared
[CAUSE]
Before rescan we call qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() to zero out all
qgroups' accounting numbers.
However we don't mark all qgroups dirty, but rely on rescan to do so.
If we have any high level qgroup without children, it won't be marked
dirty during rescan, since we cannot reach that qgroup.
This will cause QGROUP_INFO items of childless qgroups never get updated
in the quota tree, thus their numbers will stay the same in "btrfs
qgroup show" output.
[FIX]
Just mark all qgroups dirty in qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking(), so even if
we have childless qgroups, their QGROUP_INFO items will still get
updated during rescan.
Reported-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0f375eed92 upstream.
In a scenario like the following:
mkdir /mnt/A # inode 258
mkdir /mnt/B # inode 259
touch /mnt/B/bar # inode 260
sync
mv /mnt/B/bar /mnt/A/bar
mv -T /mnt/A /mnt/B
fsync /mnt/B/bar
<power fail>
After replaying the log we end up with file bar having 2 hard links, both
with the name 'bar' and one in the directory with inode number 258 and the
other in the directory with inode number 259. Also, we end up with the
directory inode 259 still existing and with the directory inode 258 still
named as 'A', instead of 'B'. In this scenario, file 'bar' should only
have one hard link, located at directory inode 258, the directory inode
259 should not exist anymore and the name for directory inode 258 should
be 'B'.
This incorrect behaviour happens because when attempting to log the old
parents of an inode, we skip any parents that no longer exist. Fix this
by forcing a full commit if an old parent no longer exists.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit f2d72f42d5 upstream.
When replaying a log which contains a tmpfile (which necessarily has a
link count of 0) we end up calling inc_nlink(), at
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:replay_one_buffer(), which produces a warning like
the following:
[195191.943673] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6924 at fs/inode.c:342 inc_nlink+0x33/0x40
[195191.943723] CPU: 0 PID: 6924 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.19.0-rc6-btrfs-next-38 #1
[195191.943724] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[195191.943726] RIP: 0010:inc_nlink+0x33/0x40
[195191.943728] RSP: 0018:ffffb96e425e3870 EFLAGS: 00010246
[195191.943730] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8c0d1e6af4f0 RCX: 0000000000000006
[195191.943731] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8c0d1e6af4f0
[195191.943731] RBP: 0000000000000097 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[195191.943732] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffb96e425e3a60
[195191.943733] R13: ffff8c0d10cff0c8 R14: ffff8c0d0d515348 R15: ffff8c0d78a1b3f8
[195191.943735] FS: 00007f570ee24480(0000) GS:ffff8c0dfb200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[195191.943736] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[195191.943737] CR2: 00005593286277c8 CR3: 00000000bb8f2006 CR4: 00000000003606f0
[195191.943739] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[195191.943740] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[195191.943741] Call Trace:
[195191.943778] replay_one_buffer+0x797/0x7d0 [btrfs]
[195191.943802] walk_up_log_tree+0x1c1/0x250 [btrfs]
[195191.943809] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[195191.943825] walk_log_tree+0xae/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[195191.943840] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x1d7/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[195191.943856] ? replay_dir_deletes+0x280/0x280 [btrfs]
[195191.943870] open_ctree+0x1c3b/0x22a0 [btrfs]
[195191.943887] btrfs_mount_root+0x6b4/0x800 [btrfs]
[195191.943894] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[195191.943899] ? pcpu_alloc+0x55b/0x7c0
[195191.943906] ? mount_fs+0x3b/0x140
[195191.943908] mount_fs+0x3b/0x140
[195191.943912] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x36/0x50
[195191.943916] vfs_kern_mount+0x62/0x160
[195191.943927] btrfs_mount+0x134/0x890 [btrfs]
[195191.943936] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[195191.943938] ? pcpu_alloc+0x55b/0x7c0
[195191.943943] ? mount_fs+0x3b/0x140
[195191.943952] ? btrfs_remount+0x570/0x570 [btrfs]
[195191.943954] mount_fs+0x3b/0x140
[195191.943956] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x36/0x50
[195191.943960] vfs_kern_mount+0x62/0x160
[195191.943963] do_mount+0x1f9/0xd40
[195191.943967] ? memdup_user+0x4b/0x70
[195191.943971] ksys_mount+0x7e/0xd0
[195191.943974] __x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30
[195191.943977] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0
[195191.943980] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[195191.943983] RIP: 0033:0x7f570e4e524a
[195191.943986] RSP: 002b:00007ffd83589478 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5
[195191.943989] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000563f335b2060 RCX: 00007f570e4e524a
[195191.943990] RDX: 0000563f335b2240 RSI: 0000563f335b2280 RDI: 0000563f335b2260
[195191.943992] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000020
[195191.943993] R10: 00000000c0ed0000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000563f335b2260
[195191.943994] R13: 0000563f335b2240 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000000ffffffff
[195191.944002] irq event stamp: 8688
[195191.944010] hardirqs last enabled at (8687): [<ffffffff9cb004c3>] console_unlock+0x503/0x640
[195191.944012] hardirqs last disabled at (8688): [<ffffffff9ca037dd>] trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c
[195191.944018] softirqs last enabled at (8638): [<ffffffff9cc0a5d1>] __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0x101/0x150
[195191.944020] softirqs last disabled at (8634): [<ffffffff9cc26bbe>] wb_wakeup_delayed+0x2e/0x60
[195191.944022] ---[ end trace 5d6e873a9a0b811a ]---
This happens because the inode does not have the flag I_LINKABLE set,
which is a runtime only flag, not meant to be persisted, set when the
inode is created through open(2) if the flag O_EXCL is not passed to it.
Except for the warning, there are no other consequences (like corruptions
or metadata inconsistencies).
Since it's pointless to replay a tmpfile as it would be deleted in a
later phase of the log replay procedure (it has a link count of 0), fix
this by not logging tmpfiles and if a tmpfile is found in a log (created
by a kernel without this change), skip the replay of the inode.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Fixes: 471d557afe ("Btrfs: fix loss of prealloc extents past i_size after fsync log replay")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+
Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/3666619.NTnn27ZJZE@merkaba/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 545e3366db upstream.
Allocating new chunks modifies both the extent and chunk tree, which can
trigger new chunk allocations. So instead of doing list_for_each_safe,
just do while (!list_empty()) so we make sure we don't exit with other
pending bg's still on our list.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 84de76a2fb upstream.
If we're allocating a new space cache inode it's likely going to be
under a transaction handle, so we need to use memalloc_nofs_save() in
order to avoid deadlocks, and more importantly lockdep messages that
make xfstests fail.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
