mmc: tifm_sd: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the
"deliberate fall-through" comment with a proper "fall through"
at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373887 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Ulf Hansson
parent
19a25d57ad
commit
a5c83eb2bd
@ -336,7 +336,8 @@ static unsigned int tifm_sd_op_flags(struct mmc_command *cmd)
|
||||
rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_R0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case MMC_RSP_R1B:
|
||||
rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_BUSY; // deliberate fall-through
|
||||
rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_BUSY;
|
||||
/* fall-through */
|
||||
case MMC_RSP_R1:
|
||||
rc |= TIFM_MMCSD_RSP_R1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user